U.S. Firms Capitalizing on Brazilian Markets

If I don't know what the selection criteria are and when it's going down, isn't it risky to call someone out of the blue and give them a score sheet with a low grade?

Doesn't this show that the company was hella focused on making me irrelevant? Even though it's completely normal for redundancy selection criteria to be based on the last twelve months of work (as stated in the company's letter), I have to admit that I don't know much about it or if anyone told me. But, for real, my performance in recent years has been seriously hampered by things like unfair treatment, bullying, fear, and racism and discrimination.However, Raymond and Paulius' tea suggests that equality does not exist. Raymond was completely screwed over by his company after three years of hard work. It was a completely bogus and unfair dismissal case. He basically spilled the beans on how he was chosen for redundancy using some biased AF selection criteria.

I was completely unfairly assessed for being redundant because the assessment was heavily influenced by this whacky bad practice approach. The same vibes have not been applied to each employee's redundancy situation. The assessment criteria raises a valid question: can someone be an assessor if they never see my work?  Raymond also expressed dissatisfaction with how quickly the redundancy process was initiated, with no reasonable communication or warning. OMG, the entire assessment process went so quickly, but then they sent out a letter to flex and cover up any sketchy or embarrassing details with a completely different date.

Paulius was hit with redundancy and was like, "Bruh, my employer didn't treat me fairly and didn't even follow the contract and the law, smh." He informed me that he was unaware of the criteria for The company would use it for assessment, fam. No cap, and we didn't even discuss the assessment criteria with him. He was thinking: "The company should've done this first, and then like, judged my work with some criteria, you know?" Still, with questions, the company could have established criteria for how timely or relevant an answer is, as well as how accurate it is. He replied: "Yo, the questions on the score-card don't have just one right answer, it's all like 'yes' or 'no'."

Recognizing cultural significance, you know?

Farm workers are essentially laborers, and employers often overlook the skills and qualifications that migrant workers bring from their home country. Less than a quarter of respondents said they had access to jobs that matched their qualifications, knowledge, and skills, so Jakub's point of view on not recognizing cultural clout for migrant farm workers did not resonate. Alina is one of them, you know. Alina spilled the tea for me: Although I am an expert in hair and beauty, I also have some secretarial skills on the side. I'm flexing my multi-talented self, you know? So, I came to this country to work on an agricultural and fruit picking farm, but I also applied to be a legal secretary to assist lawyers and legal executives, you know? Must handle all administrative tasks and keep a small legal firm running smoothly. I was completely shortlisted, and the employer said, "Yo, let's take you on apprenticeships first to level up your skills in their business." At the end of the day, I decided against taking the apprenticeship. I'm still grinding on the farm to get that bag. But, like, I totally think it's possible to get a job that's completely on fleek with someone's mad skills and qualifications they got in the UK or brought from their home country, ya know?The basic question could be answered in a variety of ways, you know? There was almost no cap rule for that. It appeared to him that questions were totally incapable of being judged subjectively or objectively, you know? Paulius cast doubt on the entire process, questioning whether it is even legitimate or reliable, you know? OMG, he was like, "Migrant workers are totally vibing with equal opportunities because we're all about providing equal services for everyone, being woke about our responsibilities, and being accountable AF for the services we provide to migrants."

I completely agree with how Alina's stories demonstrate that migrants' perspectives on finding work are all about their cultural capital, you know? 

The tea from her and others' stories appears to suggest cultural equality, ya know? However, less than a quarter of respondents agreed with this view. I was like, "Yo, I asked my friends if they thought there was equal cultural clout between the majority and the minority in our society." The majority of people stated that there is no cultural equality between the majority and minority in society, which is why migrant farm workers were mistreated because their education, skills, knowledge, and qualifications were not recognized (figure 4.5). It is the primary reason why the majority of them work on farms rather than jobs that match their skills and knowledge. Raymond was like: There's a big issue with cultural capital equality, you know? It's really hard for me to find a legitimate job that matches my qualifications. Ugh, how frustrating! This difficulty isn't an issue for the natives, fam. Ausra informed me that she knew her degrees would not be valued, fam. These views were completely rejected by a small number of people who said, "Nah, equality is totally a thing between these two groups." Like, Alina spilled the tea to me: Even if cultural capital inequality exists, it applies to both the majority and minority groups.